Thursday, February 8, 2007
Part V: What had happened?
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Part IV: Possible Scenario & Political Strategies of Google
After taking into consideration all of these points, Time Warner’s considerations of several proposals from Microsoft and a single proposal from Google alarmed me. The Business week was pointing out that Google is trying to become a rival against Microsoft, who is the emperor of the entire computer world.
At one side we have the system controller, Microsoft, and in the other case of the scales. Their technology and emergence are totally different. Of course they are both in the computer and internet services business, but the point is that Microsoft founded in 1975, and Google founded in 1998. When we take a look at their market values, Google’s rise with $120 billion market value compared to Microsoft $278 billion is very impressive.
If they become rivals, I think they already had become, because as far as I noticed, Google is supporting Fire Fox internet search bar, which means before Microsoft banned or in such a way limited its abilities on the Microsoft Internet Explorer. However, on the other hand, Microsoft is very strong compared to Google, since Microsoft is the boss, the cop, and also the innovator of the computer world. So if we witness a competition, I guess it will be very though, and we will be able to see how a giant company can act against a younger player in the market.
My thought about this deal was in a way that Google is searching a way through TV market. This is because of the unbalanced income shares between the TV advertising and the internet advertising. The total advertising spending in
When we see all these market imbalances and the addictions of the entire advertising market, we normally think “why is this happening?”
The advertising market is very closed in it-self. As far as I experienced in Turkey, which is one of the most profitable sectors compared to others, but really competitive, ad market is one of those markets which is hard to audit or control by the governments, so hard to tax. If you have good relations and a good network, you can quarter double or multi quarter double your advertisement effect, because there is an uncalculated advertisement type, which is the most effective one, advices in the articles. They are much more affective and nobody can find out about any money transactions in such a deal.
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Part III: Goooooooogle…
What is google? Is there any internet user left that does not know Google? How they did this? A portal that can answer all of your questions, and it does not disturb you. It is simple, and has a value of $120 billion. How can this be? In December 5 issue, the international business magazine Business Week made Google cover story under the headline “Googling for Gold”, and analyzing the value of the company and its potential future choices.
According to the Business Week (Dec. 5 2005, Cover Story: Googling for Google, p. 62, by Roben Farzad and Ben Elgin) Google’s shopping spree is going to determine, may be in a way limit its future strength. One of their arguments is, in a way they have an example to compare with which is Yahoo; Google has shown little interest so far in doing big deals with anyone. $120 billion company is nowadays on the edge of buying part of AOL, Yahoo, on the other hand, in 1999 passed the chance to buy eBay, which has a value around $65 billion – Yahoo’s value is $60 billion. However, the Google guys tell that “We would fund projects that have a 10% chance of earning a billion dollars,… Do not be surprised if we place smaller bets in the areas that seem very speculative or even strange” (from Google’s IPO prospectus) which in such a way means that they are going to gamble –which is not also usual for such a big company compared to its Silicon valley neighbors. And they add “As the ratio of reward to risk is increases, we will accept projects further outside our normal areas, especially when the initial investment is small.” I believe that they are going to try to change the skulled system of
On the other hand, the CVs (capital ventures) are complaining about Google, and defining the way the Google guys behave as “arrogant”, because of their way of analyzing all the details about the ideas and deals that they are asked to buy or agree. However, let me explain in a Turkish manner, you have to be careful, especially when you grow very fast, since you are going to be in the table of the wolves. Beside all, I have a feeling inside that these guys are going to make really good things, when I read “the 10 things Google has found to be found” (Google.com, www.google.com/intl/en/corporate/tenthings.html), I thought that these guys have the same mind with me, and I am sure that they are trying, just like me, finding a way to change the entire stoned, rotten system which is called capitalism, but I am changing my mind about it, and renaming it, “the starving empire of money”.
So, anyway, Google is one of the most brilliant companies of today’s economy, and their actions, purchases and projects are going to affect the economy and lots of people.